ABSTRACT
Our objective was to compare obstetrical outcomes of women with a prior cerclage for
nontraditional indications who in the subsequent pregnancy either received a history-indicated
cerclage or were followed by transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) cervical length (CL). All
women with a history- or ultrasound- indicated cerclage in a prior pregnancy and who
had a subsequent pregnancy were retrospectively identified from a preexisting database
of women at risk for preterm birth between 1995 and 2002. Only women who reached ≥ 12
weeks of gestation were included for analysis. Women with a diagnosis other than classic
cervical insufficiency were managed in the subsequent pregnancy either by history-indicated
cerclage or by serial TVU CL. The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm birth < 35
weeks. We identified 56 women with a prior cerclage for nontraditional indications.
In the subsequent pregnancy, 28 women were followed with TVU and 28 matched controls
received history-indicated cerclage. The groups were matched for demographics and
risk factors. There were no differences between the two groups in the incidence of
preterm labor < 35 weeks (21% versus 11%; p = 0.5), preterm premature rupture membranes < 35 weeks (7% versus 11%; p = 1.0), spontaneous preterm birth < 35 weeks (11% versus 11%; p = 1.0), or the gestational age at delivery (36.3 ± 6.6 versus 36.5 ± 5.6; p = 0.5). We concluded that in women with prior cerclage for indications other than
classic cervical insufficiency, repeat history-indicated cerclage may not improve
outcome compared with management with TVU CL follow-up.
KEYWORDS
Cerclage - cervical insufficiency - cervical incompetence - transvaginal ultrasound
- cervical length
REFERENCES
1 Iams J.
Abnormal cervical competence . In: Creasy R, Resnik R Maternal Fetal Medicine. 5th ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders
2004: 603
2 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists .Cervical insufficiency. ACOG
Practice Bulletin no. 48. Washington DC; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
2003
3
Rush R W, Issacs S, McPherson K, Jones L, Chalmers I, Grant A.
A randomized controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at high risk of spontaneous
preterm delivery.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1984;
91
724-730
4
MRC/RCOG Working Party on Cervical Cerclage .
Final report of the Medical Research Council/Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
Multicentre Randomised Trial of Cervical Cerclage.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1993;
100
516-523
5
Fejgin M D, Gabai B, Goldberger S, Ben-Nun I, Beyeth Y.
Once a cerclage, not always a cerclage.
J Reprod Med.
1994;
39
880-882
6
Berghella V, Daly S, Tolosa J et al..
Prediction of preterm delivery with transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix in
patients with high risk pregnancies: does cerclage prevent prematurity?.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1999;
181
809-815
7
Lazar P, Guegan S, Dreyfus J, Renaud R, Pontonnier G, Papiernik E.
Multicentered controlled trial of cervical cerclage in women at moderate risk of preterm
delivery.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol.
1984;
91
731-735
8
Althuisius S M, Dekker G A, van Geijn H P, Bekedam D J, Hummel P.
Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): study design
and preliminary results.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2000;
183
823-829
9
Bakketeig L S, Hoffman H J, Harley E E.
The tendency to repeat gestational age and birth weight in successive births.
Am J Obstet Gynecol.
1979;
135
1086-1103
10
Berghella V, Odibo A O, To M S, Rust O A, Althusius S M.
Cerclage for short cervix on ultrasound: meta-analysis of trials using individual
patient level data.
Obstet Gynecol.
2005;
106
181-189
Jacquelyn Pelham M.D.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Washington
Hospital Center
106 Irving Street, NW, Suite 3800N, Washington, DC 20010; reprints are not available
from the authors.